Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): JULY[DOI:10.37785/nw.v10n2]

The Synthetic Gaze. Generative AI and the Transformation of Contemporary Visual Authorship (English version)

Article Sidebar

Portada NAWI 10-2
Text Complete: PDF MHT
Published: 2026-07-15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2e
Keywords:
Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

Main Article Content

Fernando A. Ramos Zaga
Cesar Vallejo University image/svg+xml

Abstract

The expansion of generative artificial intelligence within the field of visual creation has triggered a profound structural transformation in the regimes of production, legitimation, and aesthetic experience. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to analyze the ontological, epistemic, and ethical mutations arising from algorithmic mediation, with the aim of establishing the theoretical foundations for a critical aesthetics of the synthetic gaze. The findings demonstrate that generative visual production does not merely extend human creativity but reconfigures artistic agency through the redistribution of authorship, the statistical recombination of originality, and the conversion of authenticity into procedural transparency. This shift underscores the need to construct ethical and regulatory frameworks that incorporate algorithmic traceability, relational responsibility, and distributive justice within creative ecosystems. Ultimately, the study proposes a reinterpretation of art as a cognitively and morally situated practice within hybrid ecologies of human and machinic creation.


Spanish version: https://nawi.espol.edu.ec/index.php/nawi/es/article/view/1234/1232

DOWNLOADS

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramos Zaga, F. A. (2026). The Synthetic Gaze. Generative AI and the Transformation of Contemporary Visual Authorship (English version). Nawi, 10(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2e

References

Ansone, A., Davis, N., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2025). Co-creating with AI: Investigating human-AI collaboration in creative practice through empirical study. Design Studies, 82, 101-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2024.101156

Bara, S., Johnson, M., & Peters, R. (2025). Aesthetic perception and moral judgment of AI-generated art: The role of process transparency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19 (1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000456

Bell, C. (1914). Art. London: Chatto & Windows.

Benjamin, W. (2003). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility. En H. Eiland & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), Selected writings, Volume 4: 1938-1940 (pp. 251-283). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1992). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Bucher, T. (2021). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

Caldwell, T. (2023). Copyright and creativity in the age of generative AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 105-124. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105124

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press. Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021). Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,

34, 8780-8794.

Dutton, D. (2003). Authenticity in art. En J. Levinson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 258-274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Elgammal, A. (2023). AI and creativity: Toward computational principles of originality in art. Leonardo, 56 (1), 48-55. https://doi. org/10.1162/leon_a_02245

Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30 (4), 681-694. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Gervais, D. J. (2020). The machine as author. Iowa Law Review, 105 (5), 2053-2106.

Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York: Pantheon Books. Goodfellow, I. (2016). NIPS 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks. Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00160

Goodfellow, I. (2024). Originality and creativity in generative models: A statistical perspective. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57 (2), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10456-2

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Irmak, N. (2024). Who is the author? Authorship, ownership, and agency in generative AI art. Philosophy & Technology, 37 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00678-9

Jaszi, P. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of "authorship". Duke Law Journal, 1991 (2), 455-502. https://doi. org/10.2307/1372804

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Krauss, R. E. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2021). Fair learning. Texas Law Review, 99 (4), 743-807.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103 (5), 1105-1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457 Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lovato, S., Piper, A. M., & Wartella, E. A. (2024). My art is not your dataset: Artists' perspectives on generative AI and copyright.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8 (CSCW1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641423

Manovich, L. (2022). AI aesthetics and the end of taste. En M. Azoulay & A. Mbembe (Eds.), Potential history: Unlearning imperialism

(pp. 412-434). London: Verso Books.

Mazzi, L. (2024). Distributed creativity: Collaboration between human and artificial intelligence in art making. AI & Society, 39 (1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01567-0

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.

Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents.

Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing human authorship in the age of generative AI: A normative framework for copyright thresholds. Laws, 14 (6), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060084

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684-10695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR52688.2022.01042

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.

Smith, J. E. (2025). Algorithmic aesthetic surplus: Platform capitalism and the production of visual culture. New Media & Society, 27 (1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205432

Vincent, J. (2023). The artists fighting back against AI image generators. The Verge. Rescatado de: https://www.theverge. com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-battle-stable-diffusion-midjourney

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Irmak, N. (2024). Who is the author? Authorship, ownership, and agency in generative AI art. Philosophy & Technology, 37 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00678-9

Jaszi, P. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of "authorship". Duke Law Journal, 1991 (2), 455-502. https://doi. org/10.2307/1372804

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Krauss, R. E. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2021). Fair learning. Texas Law Review, 99 (4), 743-807.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103 (5), 1105-1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457 Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lovato, S., Piper, A. M., & Wartella, E. A. (2024). My art is not your dataset: Artists' perspectives on generative AI and copyright.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8 (CSCW1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641423

Manovich, L. (2022). AI aesthetics and the end of taste. En M. Azoulay & A. Mbembe (Eds.), Potential history: Unlearning imperialism

(pp. 412-434). London: Verso Books.

Mazzi, L. (2024). Distributed creativity: Collaboration between human and artificial intelligence in art making. AI & Society, 39 (1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01567-0

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.

Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents.

Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing human authorship in the age of generative AI: A normative framework for copyright thresholds. Laws, 14 (6), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060084

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684-10695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR52688.2022.01042

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.

Smith, J. E. (2025). Algorithmic aesthetic surplus: Platform capitalism and the production of visual culture. New Media & Society, 27 (1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205432

Vincent, J. (2023). The artists fighting back against AI image generators. The Verge. Rescatado de: https://www.theverge. com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-battle-stable-diffusion-midjourney

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Irmak, N. (2024). Who is the author? Authorship, ownership, and agency in generative AI art. Philosophy & Technology, 37 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00678-9

Jaszi, P. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of "authorship". Duke Law Journal, 1991 (2), 455-502. https://doi. org/10.2307/1372804

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Krauss, R. E. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2021). Fair learning. Texas Law Review, 99 (4), 743-807.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103 (5), 1105-1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457 Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lovato, S., Piper, A. M., & Wartella, E. A. (2024). My art is not your dataset: Artists' perspectives on generative AI and copyright.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8 (CSCW1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641423

Manovich, L. (2022). AI aesthetics and the end of taste. En M. Azoulay & A. Mbembe (Eds.), Potential history: Unlearning imperialism

(pp. 412-434). London: Verso Books.

Mazzi, L. (2024). Distributed creativity: Collaboration between human and artificial intelligence in art making. AI & Society, 39 (1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01567-0

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.

Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents.

Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing human authorship in the age of generative AI: A normative framework for copyright thresholds. Laws, 14 (6), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060084

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684-10695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR52688.2022.01042

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.

Smith, J. E. (2025). Algorithmic aesthetic surplus: Platform capitalism and the production of visual culture. New Media & Society, 27 (1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205432

Vincent, J. (2023). The artists fighting back against AI image generators. The Verge. Rescatado de: https://www.theverge. com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-battle-stable-diffusion-midjourney

Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and its objects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Woodmansee, M. (1994). The author, art, and the market: Rereading the history of aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Zhou, C., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The double-edged sword of generative AI: Impact on creativity and diversity in content production. Creativity Research Journal, 36 (2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2287654

Issue
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): JULY[DOI:10.37785/nw.v10n2]
Section
ARTICLES

How to Cite

Ramos Zaga, F. A. (2026). The Synthetic Gaze. Generative AI and the Transformation of Contemporary Visual Authorship (English version). Nawi, 10(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2e
Licencia Creative Commons
This work is under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Comments and suggestions on the article

Managing Director

Jorge Polo Blanco, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM

Executive Director

Nayeth Solorzano, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM