Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): JANUARY

The The Extent of Journalistic Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights


Main Article Content

Cherin El Khodr

Abstract

Journalistic freedom of expression is essential for the dissemination of information as the media forms a platform for public debate necessary for a democratic society. Journalism at its best, acting in due diligence and ensuring the accuracy of gathered information in accordance with the principles and ethics of journalism, is a critical component for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Journalistic freedom helps curb corruption by granting society access to information thereby illuminating and exposing those engaged in corrupt activities. When broadcasts of grave human rights violations occur, it educates people about their rights and creates an instrument for the amplification of their voices. In addition, journalism uses documentary evidence as a means of communication and thus is also part of an advocacy drive of the media toward empowering people whose stories and messages might otherwise not be heard.

DOWNLOADS

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
El Khodr, C. (2022). The The Extent of Journalistic Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. Nawi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v6n1.a12

References

Andreotti, O., Muižnieks, N., McGonagle, T., Parmar, S., Çalı, B., Voorhoof, D., Akdeniz, Y., Altıparmak, K., Sarikakis, K., White, A., Siapera, E., & Haski, P. (2015). Journalism at Risk: Threats, Challenges and Perspective. Council of Europe.

De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 7/1996/626/809 (Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights February 24, 1997).

Dink v. Turkey, applications no. 2668/07, 6102/08, 30079/08, 7072/09 and 7124/09 (European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) September 14, 2010).

European Court of Human Rights - Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. France.

Leach, P. (2017). Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Macovei, M. (2004). Freedom of expression. A guide to the implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Germany: Council of Europe.

Najafli v. Azerbaijan, application no. 2594/07 (European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) October 2, 2012).

Oberschlick v. Austria, application No. 11662/85 (A/204) / IHRL 2951 (European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) May 23, 1991).

Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, application no. 23144/93 (European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) March 16, 2000).

Schabas, W. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Standard Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria, application no. 39378/15 (European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) February 22, 2007).

The United Nations General Assembly, Draft Comittee. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Adopted and proclaimed by UN General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948 Text: UN Document A/810.

The United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49. New York City.

Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, application no. 13778/88 (European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) June 25, 1992).

United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2011). General comment No. 34. Human Rights Treaty Bodies.

Section
ARTICLES


Comments and suggestions on the article

Managing Director

Jorge Polo Blanco, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM

Executive Director

Nayeth Solorzano, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM