La mirada sintética. Inteligencia artificial generativa y mutaciones de la autoría visual contemporánea (Versión en español)

Fernando A. Ramos-Zaga

doi:10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2

Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2026): JULIO[DOI:10.37785/nw.v10n2]

La mirada sintética. Inteligencia artificial generativa y mutaciones de la autoría visual contemporánea (Versión en español)

Texto Completo: PDF MHT

Publicado: 2026-07-15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2

Palabras clave:

Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

Fernando A. Ramos Zaga

Universidad Privada del Norte

Resumen

La expansión de la inteligencia artificial generativa en el ámbito de la creación visual ha desencadenado una transformación estructural profunda en los regímenes de producción, legitimación y experiencia estética. En ese sentido, el objetivo del presente artículo es analizar las mutaciones ontológicas, epistémicas y éticas que emergen de la mediación algorítmica, con el fin de establecer los fundamentos teóricos de una estética crítica de la mirada sintética. Los resultados muestran que la producción visual generativa no prolonga la creatividad humana, sino que reconfigura la agencia artística mediante la redistribución de la autoría, la recombinación estadística de la originalidad y la conversión de la autenticidad en transparencia procesual. Tal desplazamiento implica la necesidad de construir marcos éticos y normativos que integren trazabilidad algorítmica, responsabilidad relacional y justicia distributiva en los ecosistemas creativos. En conclusión, se establece una relectura del arte como práctica cognitiva y moralmente situada dentro de ecologías híbridas de creación humana y maquínica.

Versión en inglés: https://nawi.espol.edu.ec/index.php/nawi/es/article/view/1277/1250

DESCARGAS

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2026). La mirada sintética. Inteligencia artificial generativa y mutaciones de la autoría visual contemporánea (Versión en español). Ñawi, 10(2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2

Referencias

Ansone, A., Davis, N., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2025). Co-creating with AI: Investigating human-AI collaboration in creative practice through empirical study. Design Studies, 82, 101-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2024.101156

Bara, S., Johnson, M., & Peters, R. (2025). Aesthetic perception and moral judgment of AI-generated art: The role of process transparency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19 (1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000456

Bell, C. (1914). Art. London: Chatto & Windows.

Benjamin, W. (2003). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility. En H. Eiland & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), Selected writings, Volume 4: 1938-1940 (pp. 251-283). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1992). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Bucher, T. (2021). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

Caldwell, T. (2023). Copyright and creativity in the age of generative AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 105-124. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105124

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press. Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021). Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,

34, 8780-8794.

Dutton, D. (2003). Authenticity in art. En J. Levinson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 258-274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Elgammal, A. (2023). AI and creativity: Toward computational principles of originality in art. Leonardo, 56 (1), 48-55. https://doi. org/10.1162/leon_a_02245

Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30 (4), 681-694. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Gervais, D. J. (2020). The machine as author. Iowa Law Review, 105 (5), 2053-2106.

Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York: Pantheon Books. Goodfellow, I. (2016). NIPS 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks. Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00160

Goodfellow, I. (2024). Originality and creativity in generative models: A statistical perspective. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57 (2), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10456-2

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Irmak, N. (2024). Who is the author? Authorship, ownership, and agency in generative AI art. Philosophy & Technology, 37 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00678-9

Jaszi, P. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of "authorship". Duke Law Journal, 1991 (2), 455-502. https://doi. org/10.2307/1372804

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Krauss, R. E. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2021). Fair learning. Texas Law Review, 99 (4), 743-807.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103 (5), 1105-1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457 Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lovato, S., Piper, A. M., & Wartella, E. A. (2024). My art is not your dataset: Artists' perspectives on generative AI and copyright.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8 (CSCW1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641423

Manovich, L. (2022). AI aesthetics and the end of taste. En M. Azoulay & A. Mbembe (Eds.), Potential history: Unlearning imperialism

(pp. 412-434). London: Verso Books.

Mazzi, L. (2024). Distributed creativity: Collaboration between human and artificial intelligence in art making. AI & Society, 39 (1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01567-0

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.

Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents.

Rescatado de: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing human authorship in the age of generative AI: A normative framework for copyright thresholds. Laws, 14 (6), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060084

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684-10695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR52688.2022.01042

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.

Smith, J. E. (2025). Algorithmic aesthetic surplus: Platform capitalism and the production of visual culture. New Media & Society, 27 (1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205432

Vincent, J. (2023). The artists fighting back against AI image generators. The Verge. Rescatado de: https://www.theverge. com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-battle-stable-diffusion-midjourney

Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and its objects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Woodmansee, M. (1994). The author, art, and the market: Rereading the history of aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Zhou, C., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The double-edged sword of generative AI: Impact on creativity and diversity in content production. Creativity Research Journal, 36 (2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2287654

Número

Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2026): JULIO[DOI:10.37785/nw.v10n2]

Sección

ARTÍCULOS

Cómo citar

Ramos-Zaga, F. A. (2026). La mirada sintética. Inteligencia artificial generativa y mutaciones de la autoría visual contemporánea (Versión en español). Ñawi, 10(2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v10n2.a2