Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): JANUARY

Cinematography - A Medium for International Studies: Applying Film to Advocacy & Social Change


Main Article Content

Cédrine May Wettengel

Abstract

Mutation and adaptation of an idea and its appropriation by distinct cultures, whether national or imagined, is at the core of this article. It explores discourse generated by the documentary BROKEN and leans on the previous articles in the Trilogy. Here, discourse gets re-constructed by local circumstances.


This applied research takes its cues from two distinct groups of interviewees, those creating discourse and those absorbing and mutating it. It aims at defining to what degree global culture is absorbed, reflected upon and recreated locally.


The documentary targets audiences concerned with International Law at the example of the 2004 International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion on Israel’s Wall in the West Bank. Here the film’s journey and its metamorphosized meanings are documented while on tour to a different country in conflict, Armenia. The discourse around BROKEN witnesses’ transformation being exposed, for the first time, to an audience other than that for which it had been conceived. The article highlights the universality of law, a film’s potential for advocacy and social change.

DOWNLOADS

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wettengel, C. M. (2022). Cinematography - A Medium for International Studies: Applying Film to Advocacy & Social Change . Nawi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v6n1.a9

References

AdvocacyProductions Sàrl. (n.d.). AdvocacyProductions. Retrieved from AdvocacyProductions: https://advocacyproductions.ch

AdvocacyProductions Sàrl. (n.d.). BROKEN. Retrieved from BROKEN, the film: https://broken-the-film.com

Chevalier , J. M., & Buckles, D. (2013). Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London: Sage.

Covey, J., & Miller, V. (1997). Advocacy Sourcebook: Frameworks for Planning, Action, and Reflection. Boston: Institute for Development Research.

Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. (S. Hand, Ed.) London: Athlone.

Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (European Commission). (2014). Preparatory action 'Culture in EU external relations'. Executive Summary, European Union.

Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton, U.K.: Harvester.

Foucault, M. (1994). Truth and Power. In J. D. Faubion, Power: The Essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984 (pp. 111-133). London: Allan Lane/Penguin Books.

Foucault, M. (2000). The Subject and Power. In J. D. Faubion, Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3: Power). New York: The New Press.

Foucault, M., & Deleuze, G. (1977). Intellectuals and Power. In D. F. Bouchard, Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 205-217). New York: Cornell University Press.

Gershman, J., Boudreau, V., Ethnic Studies and Development Center Research Te, & Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. (1997). Policy influence: NGO experiences. Quezon City: Ateneo Center for Social Policy and Public Affairs; Institute for Development Research; Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Trow, M. A., Scott, P., & Schwartzman, S. (1994). New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

GmbH, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). (2017). Assessment of issues and potential intervention in Culture and Creative Industry in Armenia. SME Development in Armenia (SMEDA), Armenia.

Golden Apricot International Film Festival. (2021). Golden Apricot. Retrieved from Golden Apricot 18th Yerevan International Film Festival: https://www.gaiff.am

Gutting, G. (1994). The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hanks, W. F. (1989). Text and Textuality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 95-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.000523.

Morris, R. C. (2007). Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 355-389. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357

Mullaly, R. R. (1997). Structural Social Work: Ideology, Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pokoo, J., Lakitsch, M., & Wolter, S. (Eds.). (2015). Humanitarian Assistance in West Africa and Beyond. Austrian Study Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution.

Segev, E. (2019). Volume and control: the transition from information to power. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14, 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1662028

Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (Eds.). (1996). Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Van Dijk, T. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

Section
ARTICLES


Comments and suggestions on the article

Managing Director

Jorge Polo Blanco, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM

Executive Director

Nayeth Solorzano, PhD.
ESPOL - FADCOM